April 16, 2014

Dan Willingham On Reading And The Internet

Willingham takes a look at the latest scare about reading.


Light Posting

Posting has been light.  I took some PTO and I’ve been penning morning notes for RealClearEducation. A quick preview of what’s on the site and a look back at history to start the day. You can read those here, today’s was about Bob Feller’s no-hitter.   You can also subscribe here.

More Eduwonk content very soon!


April 15, 2014

Tony Klemmer On Teacher Leadership

Tony Klemmer takes a look at teacher leadership at RealClearEducation.


April 8, 2014

Caracalla And Ed Reform – RealClearEducation Today

If your thing is Caracalla but also education politics there is only one place you can get both: RealClearEducation Today.

On this date in 217, the Roman Emperor Caracalla was killed. He’d stopped by the side of the road to go the bathroom and was set upon by his own men. It wasn’t a surprising end for Caracalla – treachery was his way…It would be hyperbolic to compare what happened in New York this weekend to the times of Caracalla. Still, treachery was in the air as the state teachers union elected new leadership, and the episode offers some lessons for education observers….

You can read the entire thing here.

You can get RealClearEducation in your email box weekday mornings by clicking here.


Edujobs – Teaching At The Equity Project Charter School

The Equity Project is a charter school in New York City seeking to revamp teacher compensation and teacher leadership. Salaries are $125K annually and teachers work as part of a team of master teachers in a collaborative environment.  They have open slots for next year and you can learn more at information sessions on Monday, May 5 or Wednesday May 28th. More details about the application process are here.


Edujob – City Year Seattle

In Seattle, WA, City Year is looking for an executive director.  More details and how to apply here.


April 7, 2014

RealClearEducation

Today’s AM newsletter – Henry Ford and lessons for ed policy. Plus a preview of what’s happening today.


April 4, 2014

Four Thoughts On For-Profit Higher Education

The Nation has a long look at for-profit education and its lobbying efforts based on a forthcoming book by David Halperin. I don’t follow this issue especially closely because we don’t work on it at BW. You you can’t help but follow it to some extent though if you work on federal ed policy. The revelation that while attacking alternative routes into teaching as low-quality AACTE President Sharon Robinson was making hundreds of thousands of dollars on the board of a troubled for-profit college is surprising, much of the rest is not. For thoughts on the larger issues it points up:

  1. It is often challenging find good information/measured takes about the for-profits because almost  everyone deep on the issue is vested in the outcome, either for or against them. And it’s at once and obvious issue, but a complicated one. The obvious part. Overall these for-profit colleges are not as bad as you’ve probably heard – they’re worse. And they play a disproportionate role in creating student debt. But, that’s not universal. Some do provide an option for students and arguably they’re the ugly ground floor of an approach that will, over time, alter higher education. So the regulatory question is how do you clean up the bad without killing off the good. The current iteration of the “gainful employment” regulation seems to me a modest, arguably too modest, start in that direction. The Whiteboard “Education Insider” survey (pdf) found that a small majority of Insiders think this new version of the regulation will survive an inevitable court challenge (a federal court previously upheld the Department’s authority to regulate but struck down the specific metrics they choose to use).
  2. The Nation article seems well-reported but two things didn’t ring quite right. The short-selling issue (people shorting stocks of for-profits based on information about how regulations affecting them might look or using the political process to create the circumstances to short stocks) seems more of a problem than Halperin lets on.  The Department of Education’s Inspector General is looking at issues around disclosure of information during the regulatory process as well. In addition, while the Washington Post’s ownership of Kaplan, which among other things runs for-profit higher education programs, was awkward the Post has published news items critical of the industry. I haven’t seen any evidence that Don Graham used his paper to punish his opponents on this issue and absent some that’s a very questionable charge to level and an almost impossible one to disprove. Worth noting that some of the Post’s competitors almost gleefully used the issue to punish the Post!
  3. The for-profit colleges make you question everything you think about markets and competition. The better ones, or ones poised to become better ones, could use the regulatory process to skewer their lower-performing competitors. Yet they don’t. Instead there is intense pressure not to break ranks so a strength in numbers/lowest-common denominator approach prevails. Perhaps this makes economic sense somehow, but I don’t see it in this circumstance. Any school that is confident on quality should support a tougher regulation (which has the added benefit of being the right thing to do) and put some competitors out of business.  The for-profits seem to think that everyone is against them so they have to stick together. That posture might have the causation a little mixed up.
  4. Some Hill Republicans are now warning that if the Obama Administration’s gainful employment regulation is enacted it will soon be broadened to cover all institutions of higher education. Quite unclear if that’s the case, but assuming for a moment that it is, isn’t that a benefit rather than a flaw? Too many independent and public colleges and universities have deplorable outcomes, too, and so some accountability, even just eligibility for federal student aid, seems a good step.

So what does this take miss?


April 3, 2014

Edujobs – Charter Finance at LISC

Local Initiatives Support Coalition is hiring for two roles: An Asset Manager (pdf) and a Loan Officer (pdf).  These positions are with the Educational Facilities Financing Center at LISC. LISC’s portfolio of charter finance is more than $50 million.

What is LISC?

LISC is a national nonprofit organization that provides financial and technical assistance to community-based organizations working to improve social and economic conditions in low- income communities. Founded in 1979 by the Ford Foundation, LISC has grown to become the nation’s premier national nonprofit intermediary providing comprehensive support for neighborhood development and working to enhance the overall community development sector. 

Learn more about their work here.


April 2, 2014

Jonny Gomes And Education Data

Here’s this morning’s RealClearEducation Today morning email newsletter.  You can sign up  to get it each morning – free –  in your email box and the email version includes a preview of the day’s top news, commentary, and reports as well.

 

RealClearEd Today 04/02/2014: Scandal-Scarred D.C. Mayor Concedes Race

By RealClearEducation

Good morning. It’s Wednesday, April 2. At RealClearEducation this morning we have the day’s top headlines in education news, commentary, analysis, and reports, as well as a piece by TNTP’s Tim Daly, who says Northwestern’s move to unionize student athletes is “dignified” and “preposterously overdue.” As always, we’ll update throughout the day.

Sign up for our daily newsletter here.

Today is Daniel Okrent’s birthday. He’s known in some circles as the former New York Times Public Editor. And in others, especially at this time of year, he’s celebrated as the creator of Rotisserie Baseball. That game, more commonly known as “fantasy” baseball, has helped fuel the obsession with data that now characterizes baseball and other sports. But baseball, while “moneyballed,” still isn’t a purely data-driven game.

On Monday the Boston Red Sox lost their season opener to the Baltimore Orioles. They did it without the services of their left fielder, Jonny Gomes, a hero of the 2013 Red Sox team that won the World Series. Gomes didn’t start the game because Baltimore started a right-handed pitcher and other outfielders had better numbers against righties. That decision is being second-guessed among the Red Sox faithful after the loss and especially because of manager John Farrell’s decision not to pinch hit Gomes at a crucial point late in the game. Why? Because during last year’s playoff run, Gomes played and produced against all kinds of pitching, and the team was 10-1 when he did.

Gomes is a spark plug. He helps ignite teams. Many baseball fans think it’s more than coincidental that he’s played for four division winning teams in the last six seasons — the only player in the American League to have done so. Some of those teams, like last season’s Red Sox, were turnaround projects. Gomes has respectable numbers at the plate and solid defense in the field but more than that, he exudes an almost ridiculous tenacity (he once waited 27 hours after a fluke heart attack to see a doctor, even sleeping through the night) and a desire to win (you don’t see a lot of unassisted double plays by left fielders, but Gomes turned one in during the 15th inning of a game last summer). He also has sartorial flair. Gomes arrived at The White House yesterday to meet the President and celebrate the Red Sox’s championship season wearing a red, white, and blue suit. He sported a military helmet during postseason celebrations last year.

In education there is a lot of attention to data right now and widespread concern about student privacy and data security. A survey of education policy experts by Whiteboard Advisors earlier this year found that 73 percent believe there are companies operating in the educator sector in ways that violate privacy laws. Yet there is also widespread agreement that better use of educational data can provide greater personalization and customization for students and increase educational productivity. Getting the balance right is on the agenda in a number of states.

At the same time, a conversation about data is playing out in the debate about teacher effectiveness. Underneath the strident and often misleading rhetoric is a more serious question: How should policies balance human judgment and discretion with data? In most professional fields, managers use data and their own judgment and make decisions. That’s a tough sell in education with its love of metrics and compliance and its adversarial management and labor context.

It holds the field back because a culture that respects the intangibles would be complicated, and perhaps messier, but also help build a more genuine profession for teachers. The best baseball managers balance data with experience and judgment. Besides, fantasy teams don’t have character or soul. As Gomes told The Boston Globe during spring training last month:

“When you’re building a team, I’m last on the list because, when the lights go out, you don’t see the player grind out at-bats or run hard to first base every time. Or see the player respect the game and his teammates… or see the way the player approaches the game, the work ethic.”


March 31, 2014

RealClearEducation Today: Marcus Foster

Foster was born on this date in 1923.   His life, and death, shouldn’t be forgotten. RealClearEducation Today takes a look at that and previews the days news.  ICYMI Friday’s looked at Three Mile Island and Jimmy Carter.


March 28, 2014

Questions On Student Athlete Unions

There are still a lot of moves to come in the unionization for student athletes issue.  But an interesting question that hasn’t gotten a lot of attention is how different state labor laws would affect different colleges and universities if unionization proceeds?  In college sports you have public and private universities, sometimes in the same conference.  And they’re obviously in different states with different labor laws. This plays out now in terms of efforts to organize graduate students. But unevenness among graduate programs is entirely different than unevenness for college sports, which strive, excuse the pun, to have a level playing field. What are the implications if some schools have unions for athletes, others don’t? How does the NCAA react?

In one part of the country they’re asking, ‘what does it mean for the SEC?’


March 27, 2014

RealClearEducation – Morning Newsletter, Dan Willingham, Robert Frost, Satanta, And Lots Of Links!

A lot of news links over at the RealClearEducation site, a lot going on around the country and the world.

Wednesday’s RealClearEducation Today preview email took a look at Robert Frost, his birthday was yesterday.  Today’s discuses education and Native Americans.  You can subscribe to receive them every morning here.  They are archived here.

And don’t miss RealClearEducation’s Dan Willingham on reading frameworks.


Northwestern Players Union – The NFL Offers Some Lessons

By now everyone in the sports world and most in the education world know about the decision yesterday by the National Labor Relations Board to allow student athletes at Northwestern to form a union (the ruling can be appealed and overturned so it’s not final).  Colleges enjoy a sweet racket with college sports and are concerned about what it might mean. The usual pro-and anti-union arguments are rearing up.  And fans worry about what might mean for college sports.

But there is a precedent that should soothe some nerves – the NFL.  The National Football League for all its problems, which are too legion to list here, has a players union that is not a barrier to on-field performance. In fact, the NFL has struck a balance that affords players protections, vested veterans additional ones they have earned, but none of those rules affect on-field performance. Coaches can play players or cut them from the team at their discretion. Patriots coach Brendan Daly and his brother TNTP’s Tim Daly discussed some of that a few years ago.

The NFL players union is a model K-12 public schools might do well to emulate.  It’s unionization and respect for seniority coupled with respect for the importance of performance.  It protects people from jagged edges – veterans receive their salary if they’re cut during the season, for instance – but not in ways that work against the underlying goals. That’s hardly the balance of things in K-12 now.


March 25, 2014

NY Teacher Firing Overturned – You Make The Call

Interesting case in New York.  Two teachers caught having sex in a classroom – but after-hours and more or less away from students were fired.  The state’s supreme court just overturned that decision saying, among other  things, that the penalty was disproportionate to the offense and that teachers who have harmed children have not been fired so why should these two be?

In an informal survey of educators and analysts (meaning I emailed some colleagues) no one condoned it but views about appropriate action were all over the place. Some said that it’s definitely a fireable offense and that anything less is unacceptable. While others said based on the publicly known facts doesn’t seem worthy of immediate termination but rather some other action.  Others said that whatever they think is less important than what the district thought it should do and so they were opposed to the court action as a process issue. In the private sector this sort of thing is handled differently by different organizations, there are not hard and fast rules.

What do you think?


March 24, 2014

Edujob – @USC Rossier – The Katzman/Ernst Chair in Educational Entrepreneurship, Technology, and Innovation

At the University of Southern California’s Rossier school they’re launching a search for a new chair:  The Katzman/Ernst Chair in Educational Entrepreneurship, Technology, and Innovation.  

From the announcement:

This is an unprecedented position within a school of education. The individual recruited for this position will be an intellectual leader and an entrepreneur in information technologies, including advanced electronic media, telecommunications and related satellite technology. This individual will also help create new educational ventures. He or she will be able to identify and implement programs and projects at the national level to improve elementary and post-elementary education.

This person will be a visionary who will convene and lead a group of multidisciplinary scholars from such fields as business, engineering, cinematic arts, and communication, and who come from across the USC campus and beyond. In addition, she or he will establish a collaborative network of education providers in a range of settings and roles, from public and charter school operators to leaders in for-profit educational-services companies. The position will be in the Rossier School of Education and come with a fixed term non-tenure track faculty appointment. Teaching in the Rossier School’s Master’s or Ed.D. a program is a possibility.

More info via this link.


Mead & Gordon On Head Start

Sara Mead and Robert Gordon lay out an agenda for Head Start in The New Republic.


Five Questions About Politico’s Vouchers and Creationism Story

Politico Pro leading the week with a big story about public dollars, private schools, and the teaching of religion - in particular creationism.  Although it’s a minor issue in the big scheme of things, it does matter and this issue is one of the Achilles’ heels of the voucher movement. Here are five questions the story points to but doesn’t answer:

  1. The sensational lede doesn’t quite hold up.  The sum total of dollars being spent on religious schools doesn’t equal the total of dollars being spent on schools that teach creationism, for instance.  What’s the actual breakdown here?
  2. There is no high wall with schools. Besides vouchers or tax credits private schools also get dollars outside of vouchers through a variety of federal education programs they’re entitled to participate in as well as different kinds of support in many states. How do those dollars factor in?
  3. School voucher supporters can’t ignore this issue. Are all choice schools the same and we should leave it up to parents? Or is public oversight necessary? If so what sort of standards, or whose standards, should be used to marry choice and accountability where curriculum is concerned?
  4. Or does this issue just set the stage for tax credits because they cut public entanglement? And if so what does that imply for voucher supporters concerned about equity given that tax credits are not a very effective way to help the poor?
  5. The article is a little breezy on the performance of Catholic schools, how does the Catholic school sector factor into this conversation?

March 21, 2014

RealClearEducation Today

Here’s today’s morning update from RealClearEducation. You can get it weekdays by signing up here.


Ed Trust & TNTP Webinar On Equity In Access to Effective Teachers

On 4/2 Ed Trust and TNTP are hosting a webinar to look at different approaches on the teacher quality front including recruiting and staffing practices, teacher evaluations, professional development, and classroom support. It’s free. More information and RSVP via this link.  Includes Terry Grier, Jason Kamras, and experts from DCPS, HISD, as well as TNTP and Ed Trust.


March 20, 2014

More CREDO! Results From All Of CA – Never Let Them Tell You They’re All The Same!

Another CREDO report out today, this time on charter schools in all of California (pdf).  A lot of data in the report but a few things jump out:

- Note differences with Los Angeles

- Statewide improvement, sector getting stronger

- CMO results worth checking out, implications for the ongoing conversation about CMOS and one-off charters.


March 19, 2014

Greatest Edujob In The WORLD – HI Dep’t of Edu Fellowships

It’s that time of the year again, the greatest education job in the entire land is open: Summer fellowships at the Hawaii Department of Education (pdf).  Not surprisingly, highly coveted and competitive. Application period closes soon. Interesting work, fascinating education context, and did I mention it’s in HAWAII?  All you need to apply via this link.


New Edublog @ USDOE

The Department of Educaiton has launched a new blog PROGRESS – it’s focused on voices from the field looking at impact of new policies and initiatives.


March 17, 2014

City Of Angel Charters? CREDO Analysis On LA

New CREDO analysis out on charter schools in Los Angeles. Some scuttlebutt out of CA that a lot of political resistance to this one. Why? Perhaps because it shows the sector there is very strong and adding significantly to learning for kids (pdf).  You’ll get a quick intellectual honestly gut check with this one – do the same people who use earlier CREDO data to attack the charter sector acknowledge that this one shows these schools are doing a good job in LA? If history is a guide don’t hold your breath because other CREDO studies have shown strong results within particular geographies and changed few minds. A reasonable hypothesis might be that the critics are not especially empirical.Too many proponents, meanwhile, fail to engage with the limitations of the charter strategy and the problems to date.

So what the study highlights – again – is the unevenness of the sector.  For every LA there is a school district somewhere authorizing charters to recoup some resources with little attention to quality.  For all the crazy talk about privatization, most charters are actually authorized by public school districts.  But it looks like the sector is beginning to correct and overall quality should increase, you’re seeing that in the overall data from CREDO and state data. A cynic might say that accounts for some of the race to kill off charters now.  For a good look at the charter debate it’s hard to beat this Josh Greenman column today.  And the serious conversation is about how to address the structural challenges it points up, which will matter a great deal as the charter sector grows.  You can’t run an entire school system like this.


March 14, 2014

Casey Jones And Schools

That’s the subject of today’s RealClearEducation morning email, which if you subscribe also includes links to some of the top news, commentary, analysis, and reports on the site.  Subscribe here.

Here it is:

Good morning. It’s Friday March 14.

On RealClearEducation today, we have links to news, commentary, and reports from around the education world and we’ll update those throughout the day. We have original commentary by Getting Smart CEO Tom Vander Ark, who lays out problems he sees in the flurry of recent student privacy bills, and the second installment of our Morning Commute with Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO). This time, Polis — still joined by dog Gia – talks about guns in schools and the Common Core.

Today is Pi Day — so like Christmas for math-lovers. It’s also the birthday of Casey Jones, the great railroad man born in 1863. The railroads he rode helped connect this country, close the frontier, and lay the foundation for the country America is today, where people think nothing of flying across the country in just hours.

That connectivity affects education just as it affects everything else. You may have noticed some discussion about the question of whether America needs common standards across all the states. It’s been a national debate since the 1980s and is particularly acute now. Math is math and pi is pi, proponents say. Don’t-tread-on-me local control is a hallmark counter for opponents.

What’s indisputable is that Americans, including teachers, are now more mobile than ever before.* It’s an issue in the standards debate and also matters to teachers. As a new paper by RealClearEducation Executive Editor Andrew Rotherham and Chad Aldeman point out in a new analysis, fewer than one in five teachers now teach in one place and earn a full pension benefit there — important implications for how we think about retirement security for everyone who teaches for just part of their career or moves around.

Legend has it that for a decade after Casey Jones’ famous trainwreck, the imprint of his engine was visible on the embankment it slammed into – a fading reminder of what was. Perhaps it’s worth pausing to think about what aspects of education that seem so immutable today will be largely forgotten tomorrow as the world marches irreversibly forward.

*It is disputable, I should have written it more clearly. As the pension report shows the teacher labor market is changing, the data on all Americans is different.


March 13, 2014

RealClearEducation

Loads of links and content up at RealClearEducation and here’s today’s email, below, but don’t forget to get signed up to have it sent to your email every day.  The newsletter also includes links to some of the top news, commentary and analysis, and reports on the RealClearEducation site in the morning.

RealClearEducation Today:

It’s March 13th.  And it’s going to be an interesting day in the education world with a few reports coming out that seem sure to spark some debate. Watch our site for those. Also on the RealClearEducation home page this morning we have original commentary by Anne Hyslop and ex-TFAer Matthew Specht. RealClearEducation executive editor Andrew Rotherham and Richard Whitmire take a look at the national implications the charter school debate in New York City. We’ve also got our usual round-up of links from around the education world, just a few of which are previewed below in this email. Check back on our site later today for more of our Morning Commute interview with Colorado Congressman Jared Polis and for more top stories as we update throughout the day.
 
On this day in 1969, Apollo 9 screamed back to earth and splashed down under red and white parachutes in the Atlantic Ocean after a successful mission to test the lunar module. We sure were better at science and math back then! Actually, as Tom Loveless of the Brookings Institution reminded the audience at yesterday’s RealClearEducation launch, our math achievement lagged other countries in the 1960s, too. The issue was just viewed differently than it is today. Later in 1969, those mediocre mathematicians (with an assist from the Germans) put people on the moon and brought them home again, something no other country has accomplished.
 
The commander of Apollo 9 was astronaut James McDivitt who also flew on Gemini 4. He’s known as a graduate of the University of Michigan (two Wolverines were in the three-man crew for that mission) where he earned a B.A. and was later awarded a honorary doctorate. But he started his higher education at a community college – Jackson Junior College.
 
A good reminder of the diversity of America’s education system as well as the longevity and complexity of our educational challenges.


Friends Without Benefits

Chad Aldeman and I have a new paper out today about teacher pensions, Friends Without Benefits (pdf). It looks at how the current approach to teacher pensions works in the context of broader retirement security issues.

If you’ve followed our work on teacher pensions you know that we see the fiscal problems facing teacher pension plans as a result of bad decisions by state policymakers and a corresponding lack of fiscal discipline as well as ill-considered benefit enhancements. Shoring that up is a fiscal sustainability issue. But there are also a broader set of design questions given what we know about the changing teacher workforce.  Friends Without Benefits is about those design issues and the impact they have on America’s largest class of B.A. workers.

In Friends Without Benefits we use state pension plan data to estimate how many teachers will qualify for at least a minimal pension benefit. Overall fewer than one in five teachers will stay long enough to reach their normal retirement age. But it varies, for instance,

  • At least two-thirds of teachers in Idaho, California, and Kentucky will qualify for a pension benefit.
  • Nine states—Maine, Vermont, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Mississippi, Wyoming, Texas, Nebraska, and Arizona—and the District of Columbia estimate that fewer than 10 percent of teachers will remain in the state system long enough to earn a secure retirement benefit.
  • Maine estimates that 86.1 percent of teachers will not qualify for a pension, and the District of Columbia estimates that four out of five beginning teachers will not.
  • Only about 25 percent of teachers will qualify in Mississippi, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Hawaii.
  • Fewer than 35 percent of teachers will stay long enough to qualify for a pension in Florida, Nebraska, Indiana, South Carolina, New Mexico, Ohio, Georgia, and North Carolina.

The retirement security issues here are substantial because the savings penalties for mobility are large. An individual teacher could forfeit up to 6.5 percent of her annual salary for one year, or, due to compound interest, 22.6 percent of her annual salary after three years according to the new Bellwether analysis. To put these penalties in dollar terms, a hypothetical teacher earning $40,000 a year could face a savings penalty of $2,601 for teaching only one year and $9,035 if s/he left after three years. Teachers get back their own contributions, if they elect to, but this money stays with the pension funds and is used to supplement the pensions of the remaining teachers.  It’s important to note that there penalties for teachers even if they stay in teaching but build a 30 year career across multiple states or cities. This problem does not just affect those who leave the field.

These issues are becoming more acute because states are addressing pension fiscal problems by making pension plans worse for new and future teachers. The politics behind that are obvious but it’s not good for the field long term. Meanwhile, it’s important to note that just qualifying for a minimum benefit is not sufficient as a personal retirement strategy. What we’re highlighting here might seem like small amounts but remember this is money that could be used as a savings foundation, to grow over decades. Teachers spend, on average, a few hundred dollars out of pocket each year and its a perennial political issue. This penalty is much more substantial yet generally it’s crickets.

The pension debate is too often framed as the status quo versus 401(k) style plans modeled on the private sector. In fact, there are options between those approaches that could work better for teachers and taxpayers. But it’s important to look at those issues through a frame of all teachers, not just the minority who spend an entire career in one place. You can learn more about all that at Teacherpensions.org a site Bellwether set up to provide information on the issue.


March 12, 2014

More de Blasio! Whitmire And I Can’t Quit Ya!

In Slate Richard Whitmire and I take a look at the big implications of what so far is a small fight over charters in New York City:

From the rhetoric, you’d think de Blasio had personally bounced kids out of charter schools across all five boroughs. In fact, in his first executive action on the issue, he blocked only three expansions, but in the process managed to anger charter supporters with his tactics and allowed centrist Democrats such as Gov. Andrew Cuomo to score points by portraying him as an ideologue. De Blasio also finds himself in a pretty lonely situation: By going after the charters, he is attacking one of the most promising urban school reform strategies available to Democratic mayors across the country these days, and he’s doing it without offering a clear alternative…

…If de Blasio can figure out how to regain momentum and harness progressive support to improve schools in New York City—taking the rough edges off of Mayor Bloomberg–era policies and hewing a different path from reformist Democratic mayors—that would change the terms of the national education debate. If de Blasio can’t produce political and educational results, he will deal a devastating blow to the national anti-reform movement. That’s why so much is riding on who comes out on top.

We looked at all this in USAT last month.


RealClearEducation Launch

If you haven’t been over to RealClearEducation today’s a good day to go.  We’ll have video from the panels at this morning’s launch event later. Right now there are key links from around the education world as well as original commentary by Massachusetts teachers union leader Paul Toner and North Carolina high school student Joshua Mathew.  Here’s our newsletter from today, which goes out in the morning, you can sign up here to receive it free each weekday:

It’s March 12, 2014. We’re starting our day near Capitol Hill at the RealClearEducation launch event.  An all-star line-up of analysts and experts will look at some hot current issues as we formally launch the site. 
 On RealClearEducation, we have original commentary by Massachusetts teachers union leader Paul Toner and a piece by 16-year-old North Carolina student Joshua Mathew, as well as plenty of links to a variety of news, analysis, commentaries, and reports. You can find just a few of them previewed below, and we’ll update them during the day. We’ll bring you more of our Morning Commute interview with Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) tomorrow.
 
On Capitol Hill this morning, congressional hearings are looking at student loans and charter schools. Two contentious issues highlighting how empiricism and values both matter to education policy decisions. As a field, education does not do a great job unbundling the two and weaponizes evidence while pretending many policy fights aren’t fundamentally about values tensions.
 
Eighty-four years ago today, values tensions were erupting in India as Ghandi launched his Salt March. A master of political symbolism Ghandi understood how much symbols, like making salt without paying tax, mattered. Public schools are a potent symbol here at home, and that’s why the debates about them can be so strident. Yet it does not seem that any faction in the education debate has effectively mastered the political art of symbols. One side says its opponents are billionaires, financiers and stooges for the one percent. That side says its opponents don’t care a whit about children. Both are unrecognizable distortions. But more to the point neither is a symbol that inspires or rallies people to action. One of the most potent symbols in our democracy – the public school- remains a jump ball.


March 11, 2014

RealClearEducation

If you’re not on the RealClearEducation’s daily email list, this morning’s is below. And you can sign up (free) here.

It’s March 11, 2014. Welcome to the inaugural morning update from RealClearEducation. Below you will find just a handful of the news stories, commentaries, and reports leading our site this morning. But the best content lives on our site – there’s plenty more at RealClearEducation.com, and we’ll update with more throughout the day. Also on our front page this morning: the first column by RealClearEducation columnist Dan Willingham and a Morning Commute interview with Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO), where he talks Bill de Blasio and New York.  All week we’ll post video from that interview on a range of issues.

RealClearEducation officially launches tomorrow morning at an event in Washington, D.C. featuring a great lineup of panelists to discuss key issues. It’s not too late to RSVP if you’d like to join us, but space is limited. 

If you’re not sure what we’re up to, here’s a short editor’s note describing more about what you can expect from RealClearEducation. 

It’s a fitting day to launch this newsletter, which will preview the day each weekday. On this date 191 years ago, Samuel Read Hall opened the first teacher training school in the United States. Hall had agreed to come to Concord, Vt. to serve as a pastor but only with an agreement that he could launch such a school. 

Almost two centuries later, how to train teachers is a hotbed of controversy. It’s just one of many debates in education that frequently give off more heat than light. That probably wouldn’t make sense to Hall.  He was homeschooled, but later taught at a private school, and obviously believed in teacher training.  In other words, he cut across various parts of this sector.

We’ll try to do that, too.